ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026
A study on the association between different delivery modes and pelvic floor muscle strength in women during early postpartum period.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/objectives: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) arises from factors such as degeneration and trauma, leading to weakened pelvic floor fascia, ligaments, perineum, adjacent muscles, and other supporting structures in women. Clinically, PFD manifests as stress urinary incontinence (SUI), pelvic organ prolapse (POP), and abnormal pelvic floor muscle strength, substantially impairing women's health. This study investigated the association between pelvic floor electromyography results in postpartum women at 6-8 weeks after delivery and various pregnancy- and childbirth-related factors, with the aim of identifying determinants of impaired pelvic floor function during the early postpartum period. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 1,154 postpartum women who delivered at the Obstetrics Department of Zhongshan Hospital, Dalian University, and underwent pelvic floor electromyography 6-8 weeks postpartum. Participants were classified into the vaginal delivery group ( Results: Electrical activity of pelvic floor muscles in both the fast- and slow-twitch phases was lower in the vaginal delivery group compared with the cesarean section group, whereas resting-phase values before and after contraction were higher in the cesarean section group. In the vaginal delivery group, independent risk factors for early postpartum pelvic floor muscle strength impairment included pregnancy weight gain > 16 kg, second-stage labor duration ≥ 2 h, advanced maternal age at first birth, episiotomy, perineal laceration, and gestational hypertension. In the cesarean section group, pregnancy weight gain ≥ 11.5 kg, pre-pregnancy BMI > 24 kg/m², gestational hypertension, premature rupture of membranes, preeclampsia, history of uterine fibroids, and full-term delivery were identified as independent risk factors. Conclusions: Both delivery modes are associated with changes in early-postpartum pelvic-floor muscle electromyographic activity. Altered EMG suggestive of impaired muscle activation is observed more prominently among women after vaginal delivery, while greater changes in resting pelvic-floor muscle tone are noted in the cesarean-delivery group. Cesarean delivery, therefore, does not eliminate the risk of impaired pelvic-floor muscle function or the development of PFD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.