ArticleResearch square2026
Deep Learning for Automated Tic Detection and Prediction in Tourette Syndrome Using Electromyography and Video.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tourette syndrome is characterized by involuntary motor and vocal tics, which are challenging to monitor objectively. This study evaluated convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and Transformer models on EMG and video data ('Rest', 'Tic', and 'Voluntary Movement') for detection and prediction. We hypothesized that EMG windows <5s would better capture tics and improve detection and prediction accuracy. 685 EMG recordings (n=16 participants) were each segmented into 1-, 5-, and 10-second windows. Each model was trained on clinical EMG and validated on held-out data, using corresponding expert-annotated video labels as ground truth. We evaluated model performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with 95% confidence. Detection performance exceeded prediction across models. The temporal CNN achieved the highest detection performance (mean AUROC 0.66±0.05), with optimal results in 5s windows (AUROC up to 0.82 for tic detection). In contrast, tic prediction performance was lower (best 1s-AUROC 0.66 (0.65-0.68)). Contrary to our hypothesis, longer temporal windows (≥5s) improved tic detection, suggesting that tic-related EMG patterns benefit from extended temporal context, whereas prediction relied on short-term, 1-second signal dynamics. These findings help define a benchmark and suggest that future progress will depend on multimodal integration, patient-specific adjustments, and advanced temporal modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.