ArticleResearch square2026
Fragmented ownership and multilevel barriers to breast MRI screening among high-risk women: A qualitative study informing development of clinical decision support.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Women at high risk for breast cancer include those with pathogenic variants in hereditary breast cancer predisposition genes, high-risk benign breast lesions, or a lifetime risk over 20% based on validated models. Supplemental breast MRI screening improves early detection and reduces interval cancers in high-risk women. Despite recommendations from professional organizations for breast MRI screening among high-risk women, uptake remains low. To better understand breast MRI utilization, we conducted a qualitative study exploring healthcare provider and patient perspectives to inform development of a screening module within our patient-facing web-based decision aid, Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 women at high risk for breast cancer and 17 healthcare providers at an urban academic medical center in New York City. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using Dedoose software. Transcripts were analyzed thematically to identify patterns in clinician communication strategies, MRI screening practices, as well as barriers and facilitators shaping implementation. Results: All enrolled providers were female, including six primary care providers (PCPs), five gynecologists, four breast radiologists, and two cancer genetic counselors. Among enrolled patients, mean age was 51.8 years (SD, 14.8) and 40% were Hispanic, 40% non-Hispanic White, 10% non-Hispanic Black, and 10% other. More than half of providers (59%) had ordered a breast MRI for high-risk patients, and 55% of patients had previously undergone MRI screening. The three themes that emerged included: 1) responsibility in initiating MRI screening was fragmented across specialties; 2) patients and providers encountered barriers at every step of the screening process, including knowledge gaps and uncertainty about insurance coverage; 3) both groups identified a need for clearer, consolidated guidelines and accessible resources to support informed decision-making. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the need to address structural and communication barriers to improve MRI screening uptake among high-risk women and their providers. Integrating electronic medical record (EMR)-based risk assessment and patient educational materials into clinical workflows may support informed, shared decision-making. Future work will involve design and usability testing of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.