ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Eye-specific drive and binocular suppression in mouse visual cortex during critical period development.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A key function of cortical sensory circuits is to integrate information from multiple sources to build a unified representation of the external environment. The binocular region of the mouse primary visual cortex (bV1) is a valuable model for studying sensory integration, as visual response properties of inputs from the contralateral (contra) and ipsilateral (ipsi) eye onto bV1 neurons become matched to one another over development. While the alignment of visual responses from each eye during this developmental critical period has been well-characterized, it remains unclear how this interocular alignment influences, and is influenced by, the binocularly driven responses of bV1 neurons. Here, we recorded the monocular and binocular visual response properties of layer 2/3 bV1 neurons by performing chronic two-photon calcium imaging at multiple time points spanning the ocular-dominance critical period. We found that ipsi driven responses strengthened in bV1 neurons alongside a concurrent increase in binocular suppression. Binocular tuning properties were more strongly aligned with contra responses than with ipsi responses throughout development but became progressively better matched to ipsi responses. Additionally, the explained variance of ipsi input to predicting binocular tuning increased. In chronically tracked bV1 neurons, the preferred orientation of ipsi eye driven responses was less stable than that of contra eye driven responses, and in well-tuned stable binocular neurons, ipsi and contra preferences became progressively better matched. Using population-based decoding analyses, we found that while monocular and binocular visual encoding remained stable, there was increased generalizability between visual encoding by binocular and ipsi eye driven responses. Overall, our data suggest a reciprocal interaction between ipsi development and binocular responses, such that ipsi visual inputs dynamically structure excitatory as well as putative inhibitory drive onto binocular neurons during the critical period to generate the circuitry that implements integrated binocular vision.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.