ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Network biology to artificial intelligence: building the next generation of predictive drug discovery.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug discovery remains constrained by high attrition rates, prolonged timelines, and limited ability to translate molecular insights into effective therapies. Although reductionist approaches targeting individual molecules have delivered transformative medicines, successful patient-centric treatment remains a major challenge. Furthermore, increasing evidence demonstrates that therapeutic outcomes emerge from complex, dynamic, and context-dependent biological networks. Systems biology has provided a framework to understand these interactions, yet its predictive capability has been limited by biological complexity, incomplete mechanistic knowledge, and the predominance of associative omics data. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning, deep learning, and multimodal foundation models, now offer unprecedented opportunities to integrate increasingly large and heterogeneous biomedical datasets and uncover complex biological relationships. The convergence of AI with systems biology may provide a framework for developing mechanistically informed and testable predictive models that extend beyond target identification toward understanding disease mechanisms, therapeutic responses, and treatment failures. However, mechanistic integration should not be assumed to improve prediction universally. Its value must be evaluated against appropriately matched data-driven models under defined biological conditions. Ultimately, AI-driven systems biology approaches could contribute to the development of dynamic, patient-specific computational representations of biological systems, potentially accelerating precision medicine and transforming drug discovery from empirical experimentation toward predictive, mechanism-guided therapeutic design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.