Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780123›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Network biology to artificial intelligence: building the next generation of predictive drug discovery.

Kumar Selvarajoo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kumar SelvarajooKey Laboratory of Preclinical Research of Antitumor Drugs, Taizhou Institute of Zhejiang University, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery remains constrained by high attrition rates, prolonged timelines, and limited ability to translate molecular insights into effective therapies. Although reductionist approaches targeting individual molecules have delivered transformative medicines, successful patient-centric treatment remains a major challenge. Furthermore, increasing evidence demonstrates that therapeutic outcomes emerge from complex, dynamic, and context-dependent biological networks. Systems biology has provided a framework to understand these interactions, yet its predictive capability has been limited by biological complexity, incomplete mechanistic knowledge, and the predominance of associative omics data. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning, deep learning, and multimodal foundation models, now offer unprecedented opportunities to integrate increasingly large and heterogeneous biomedical datasets and uncover complex biological relationships. The convergence of AI with systems biology may provide a framework for developing mechanistically informed and testable predictive models that extend beyond target identification toward understanding disease mechanisms, therapeutic responses, and treatment failures. However, mechanistic integration should not be assumed to improve prediction universally. Its value must be evaluated against appropriately matched data-driven models under defined biological conditions. Ultimately, AI-driven systems biology approaches could contribute to the development of dynamic, patient-specific computational representations of biological systems, potentially accelerating precision medicine and transforming drug discovery from empirical experimentation toward predictive, mechanism-guided therapeutic design.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DiscoverySystems BiologyAnimalsHumansPrecision MedicinePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Modelsartificial intelligencedigital twinsdrug discoverynetwork biologyprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID42780123
PMCPMC13597424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.