SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2026
Effectiveness of emerging technology-assisted rehabilitation in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT), virtual reality (VR), and other emerging technology-assisted interventions are increasingly used in pediatric neurorehabilitation, but their effects across functional domains and follow-up periods in children with cerebral palsy (CP) remain unclear. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 23, 2026. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these interventions with conventional rehabilitation in children with CP were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2). Random-effects meta-analyses generated mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses examined technology type and follow-up duration. The certainty of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Forty-six RCTs involving 1,812 children were included. Emerging technology-assisted interventions improved performance on the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT; MD = -2.83, 95% CI -4.39 to -1.27), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT; MD = 43.56, 95% CI 25.55 to 61.57), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG; MD = -2.17, 95% CI -3.60 to -0.75), Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS; MD = 5.21, 95% CI 4.06 to 6.37), Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) dimension D (MD = 3.99, 95% CI 1.61 to 6.37), and GMFM dimension E (MD = 8.90, 95% CI 5.18 to 12.62). RAGT favored gait outcomes, whereas VR favored balance outcomes. Upper-limb spasticity measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) decreased (MD = -0.40, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.21). ABILHAND-Kids questionnaire scores showed no immediate improvement (MD = 2.00, 95% CI -1.01 to 5.01) but improved at ≥6 weeks (MD = 2.54, 95% CI 0.41 to 4.66). Most gains were immediate; only balance and manual ability remained significant at longer follow-up. Conclusion: Emerging technology-assisted rehabilitation improves gait, mobility, balance, gross motor function, and upper-limb outcomes in children with CP. RAGT and VR show domain-specific advantages. Evidence certainty ranged from high to very low, and further high-quality RCTs with extended follow-up are needed. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251157757, Identifier CRD420251157757.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.