Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42780068›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Automated Identification of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from Cardiac Catheterization Reports using Large Language Models.

Nilay Bhatt, Fred Warner, Jennifer Miao, Ravi Thakker, Golsa Joodi, Pablo Cantero-Schaffer, Bobak Mortazavi, Chenxi Huang, Harlan M Krumholz, Karthik Murugiah

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nilay BhattDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Fred WarnerCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.
Jennifer MiaoSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Ravi ThakkerSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Golsa JoodiSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Pablo Cantero-SchafferSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Bobak MortazaviCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.
Chenxi HuangCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.
Harlan M KrumholzCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.ORCID 0000-0003-2046-127X
Karthik MurugiahCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.ORCID 0000-0001-7932-382X

Funding

Automated ascertainment of bleeding and target lesion revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using electronic health record (EHR) dataK08HL157727 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Karthik Murugiah · 2022 to 2026
$831k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL157727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Manual abstraction of complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) variables from cardiac catheterization reports is labor-intensive and limits scalable cardiovascular research. We evaluated open-weight large language models (LLMs) for automated complex PCI phenotyping. Methods: We evaluated three LLMs (Llama 3.3 70B, Meditron-7B, and BioMistral-7B) using manually annotated catheterization reports from three hospitals within Yale New Haven Health. Models identified PCI reports and extracted six complex PCI features: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation PCI with two stents, chronic total occlusion, ≥3 stents, and total stent length ≥60 mm. Results: Among 1,412 clinical notes, 596 were PCI reports. Llama 3.3 70B outperformed the smaller domain-specific models across most tasks. For PCI identification, Llama 3.3 70B achieved 100.0% sensitivity, 93.8% specificity, 96.4% accuracy, and 95.9% F1 score. Among 590 evaluable PCI reports (excluding 6 indeterminable cases due to missing variables) for complex PCI classification, Llama 3.3 70B achieved 97.7% sensitivity, 80.1% specificity, 57.6% positive predictive value, 99.2% negative predictive value, 83.9% accuracy, and 72.5% F1 score. Performance was higher for explicitly documented variables, including stent number and length, and lower for variables requiring interpretation across procedural details, including lesion count, bifurcation PCI, and chronic total occlusion PCI. Llama 3.3 70B had the highest accuracy at each site for complex PCI classification but significant site-level heterogeneity was observed. Conclusion: A high-capacity open-weight LLM accurately extracted complex PCI variables from unstructured reports and outperformed smaller domain-specific models. These findings support the potential use of locally deployable LLMs for scalable automated PCI phenotyping.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac catheterizationelectronic health recordslarge language modelspercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID42780068
PMCPMC13596485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.