ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Automated Identification of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from Cardiac Catheterization Reports using Large Language Models.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Manual abstraction of complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) variables from cardiac catheterization reports is labor-intensive and limits scalable cardiovascular research. We evaluated open-weight large language models (LLMs) for automated complex PCI phenotyping. Methods: We evaluated three LLMs (Llama 3.3 70B, Meditron-7B, and BioMistral-7B) using manually annotated catheterization reports from three hospitals within Yale New Haven Health. Models identified PCI reports and extracted six complex PCI features: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation PCI with two stents, chronic total occlusion, ≥3 stents, and total stent length ≥60 mm. Results: Among 1,412 clinical notes, 596 were PCI reports. Llama 3.3 70B outperformed the smaller domain-specific models across most tasks. For PCI identification, Llama 3.3 70B achieved 100.0% sensitivity, 93.8% specificity, 96.4% accuracy, and 95.9% F1 score. Among 590 evaluable PCI reports (excluding 6 indeterminable cases due to missing variables) for complex PCI classification, Llama 3.3 70B achieved 97.7% sensitivity, 80.1% specificity, 57.6% positive predictive value, 99.2% negative predictive value, 83.9% accuracy, and 72.5% F1 score. Performance was higher for explicitly documented variables, including stent number and length, and lower for variables requiring interpretation across procedural details, including lesion count, bifurcation PCI, and chronic total occlusion PCI. Llama 3.3 70B had the highest accuracy at each site for complex PCI classification but significant site-level heterogeneity was observed. Conclusion: A high-capacity open-weight LLM accurately extracted complex PCI variables from unstructured reports and outperformed smaller domain-specific models. These findings support the potential use of locally deployable LLMs for scalable automated PCI phenotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.