ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Distinct Roles of Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Speech-in-Noise Perception.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Difficulty perceiving speech in noise is the primary complaint of patients seeking hearing healthcare, even absent overt losses in audiometric thresholds. Yet current clinical practice largely focuses on sensory function while ignoring the potentially outsized effects of executive function on everyday suprathreshold listening. Speech perception in noise depends on the dynamic interplay between the fidelity of sensory coding along the auditory pathway and higher-order top-down cognitive processes that support goal-directed listening, both of which can independently change across the lifespan. Here we examined how two subcomponents of executive function, working memory and inhibitory control, vary across the adult lifespan and contribute to speech-in-noise performance. Two hundred participants aged 18 to 73 with normal hearing thresholds were tested on a validated online auditory psychophysics platform. Working memory was assessed with an n-back task and inhibitory control with an auditory Stroop task. Participants then performed two speech-in-noise tasks: a modified rhyme test emphasizing sensory coding through energetic masking at the cochlea, and a matrix sentence task emphasizing executive function through informational masking. Age significantly affected performance on both tasks. Aging was associated with reduced inhibitory control (increased Stroop cost) but no significant effect on working memory. Regression analyses revealed that both working memory and inhibitory control predicted performance on the informational masking task, whereas only inhibitory control predicted performance on the energetic masking task. These findings underscore the critical role of executive function in everyday suprathreshold listening and support including cognitive measures in clinical assessments of hearing difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.