ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2026
Using cell free DNA (cfDNA) and RNA (cfRNA) in the diagnosis and monitoring of primary and metastatic CNS tumors.
Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a relatively accessible biospecimen, and liquid biopsy (LBx) testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides actionable information on genomic abnormalities that can guide clinical decisions and therapeutic selection. To evaluate the potential clinical utility of CSF LBx, we analyzed real-world LB testing data from 1391 CSF samples. Methods: CSF samples were submitted for clinical testing with various referring diagnoses, including primary brain tumors and metastatic tumors. NGS testing of cell-free DNA and RNA (cfDNA and cfRNA) as well as cellular RNA was performed using a targeted 302-gene DNA panel and a targeted RNA panel encompassing more than 1600 genes. Results: Of all samples, 231 (16.6%) were completely negative for any abnormality, 69 (5.0%) showed findings consistent with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), 2 (0.1%) demonstrated B-cell clonality alone, and 14 (1.0%) showed chromosomal abnormalities without identified mutations. The remaining 1075 cases (78.4%) were positive for mutations with or without additional abnormalities, consistent with primary or metastatic malignancy. cfRNA levels were extremely low in the majority of cases, with expression levels near zero across a significant number of genes. Nevertheless, cellular and cfRNA were adequate for the detection of fusion genes in 68 cases (4.9%) and CAR-T constructs in 5 cases (0.4%) of lymphoid neoplasms previously treated with CAR-T therapy, including cases in which CAR-T cells were undetectable in peripheral blood. Conclusions: These findings suggest that LBx using combined DNA and RNA NGS testing of CSF is a reliable approach that yields potentially practice-changing clinical information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.