ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Noise-induced hearing loss delays auditory learning and reduces the influence of acoustic evidence on choice.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) degrades auditory sensitivity, but how it affects the learning of sound-guided decisions remains unclear. We trained adult Mongolian gerbils with normal-hearing (NH) or permanent NIHL, induced by a 2-hour exposure to 120 dB SPL broadband noise, to discriminate 4- versus 12-Hz amplitude-modulated (AM) broadband noise presented in a two-alternative forced-choice task. Stimuli were presented at comparable sensation levels across groups. Relative to NH animals, NIHL animals required approximately 2.5 times more sessions and 2.9 times more trials to reach task acquisition criterion. This learning delay was not explained by reduced task engagement, response latency, or auditory brainstem response threshold shift. Video tracking showed that spatial occupancy refined with training in both groups, whereas trial-by-trial movement path trajectories became less variable in NH animals. Per-session and dynamic trial-by-trial logistic regression models revealed that the influence of the task-relevant acoustic stimulus increased with training in both groups but remained consistently lower in NIHL animals, whereas sound-independent choice tendencies were largely unchanged. Together, these results suggest that NIHL delays auditory learning by reducing the influence of acoustic evidence on choice, indicating that hearing loss can alter how sensory experience is used to acquire new behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.