Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42779838›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Predicting Neoantigen Immunogenicity from

Timothy J Sears, Ko-Han Lee, María Muñoz Pérez, Robert Rasmussen, Meghana S Pagadala, Kairi Tanaka, Ajay Subramanian, Everett J Moding, Maurizio Zanetti, Hannah Carter

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Timothy J SearsBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-1509
Ko-Han LeeBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9162-3486
María Muñoz PérezDepartment of Bioengineering, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Robert RasmussenBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Meghana S PagadalaBiomedical Sciences Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7591-6035
Kairi TanakaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Ajay SubramanianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7892-886X
Everett J ModingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7913-5351
Maurizio ZanettiMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6346-8776
Hannah CarterBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1729-2463

Funding

TR&D 3 - Network Guided Machine LearningP41GM103504 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI IDEKER, TREY · 2012 to 2024
$17.3M
THE CANCER EPITOPE DATABASE AND ANALYSIS RESOURCEU24CA248138 · NCI · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI PETERS, BJOERN, SETTE, ALESSANDRO · 2021 to 2025
$4.6M
Comprehensive identification of germline-somatic interactionsR01CA269919 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Ludmil B Alexandrov, Hannah Kathryn Carter · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA269919NCI NIH HHS U24 CA248138NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoantigen immunogenicity prediction is fundamental to personalized cancer vaccines, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy, and TCR-T cell engineering. Existing computational predictors rely primarily on in-vitro correlates of peptide presentation or models trained against assay-based reactivity, and they are typically validated within a single therapeutic setting. We reasoned that the most direct evidence of neoantigen immunogenicity is longitudinal in-vivo elimination: under immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), subclones bearing recognized neoantigens are selectively depleted over time. Here, we present the Neoantigen Elimination Model (NEMo), a two-compartment (CD8 and CD4) machine learning classifier trained on the in-vivo editing (IVE) of neoantigens across serially sequenced, ICB-treated tumors. By using mechanistically inspired NeoPrecis features designed to capture determinants of immunogenicity beyond MHC binding affinity, NEMo recovered assay-confirmed immunogenic neoantigens across four independent, unseen clinical settings-pre-existing immunogenicity screening, personalized cancer vaccines, TIL therapy, and a radiotherapy±ICB ctDNA cohort-and stratified progression-free survival more strongly than ELISPOT-confirmed reactivity. The editing signal further revealed an immune-evasion architecture in which oncogenic drivers and neoantigens restricted to lost or silenced HLA alleles are systematically spared from editing.

Indexed as

immunoeditingimmunotherapyNeoantigenspersonalized cancer vaccine

Identifiers

PMID42779838
PMCPMC13596422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.