ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
A single cortical circuit implements fast and slow visual search.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How the brain produces different behaviors from a fixed anatomical substrate is a foundational question in neuroscience. The dominant account holds that behavioral flexibility requires distinct neural circuits: dedicated systems selectively recruited for different processing modes. An alternative proposes that flexibility arises not from switching between circuits, but from dynamically controlling the speed at which a shared circuit operates. Here, we test this account directly using intracranial EEG recordings from nineteen human patients performing two visual search tasks of markedly different difficulty: an easy color-singleton search and a difficult orientation search, a fast vs. slow dissociation attributed for four decades to distinct anatomical and oscillatory neural systems. We show that both search tasks recruit the same cortical regions, oscillatory frequencies, and processing hierarchy. Dynamic time warping reveals that the two neural trajectories are time-stretched versions of one another; the same temporal scaling appears within each condition between faster and slower trials, indexing response speed rather than the distinction between tasks. Alpha-band oscillations (~8-10 Hz) support this temporal scaling through two coordinated mechanisms: synchronizing activity across a posterior cortical network and phase-gating local high-frequency activity (70-150 Hz) within those regions at the same preferred phase in both conditions. These findings establish that, for the two tasks studied here, fast and slow visual search are not implemented by selecting between distinct dedicated circuits, but by adjusting the speed of a single alpha-coordinated architecture. The same principle may apply to other search tasks, and to other domains in which dual-process architectures have been invoked, a testable prediction for future studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.