ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Synthetic Echocardiograms from Diffusion Models in Rare Cardiovascular Disease.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The limited availability of imaging data for uncommon cardiovascular phenotypes constrains the development of robust imaging models. We evaluated whether class-conditional diffusion models can generate synthetic transthoracic echocardiograms that improve downstream cardiac imaging tasks. The primary application was cardiac amyloidosis detection in a Duke University cohort using a two-step classifier, with external analyses using EchoNet-Dynamic for image-fidelity assessment and EchoNet-LVH for wall-thickness phenotype classification. The Duke cohort was partitioned at the patient-encounter level into 70% training, 15% validation, and 15% test sets; generators were trained only on the training partition, augmentation levels were selected using validation AUROC, and final evaluation used held-out real test data. In the Duke all-view two-step analysis, adding synthetic images increased AUROC from 0.883 to 0.924, with an AUROC difference of 0.041 (95% CI, 0.013-0.069); in EchoNet-LVH, AUROC increased from 0.832 to 0.864, with an AUROC difference of 0.032 (95% CI, 0.021-0.044). Expert review found that synthetic images were sometimes difficult to identify as synthetic, but rated them lower for diagnostic adequacy. These findings suggest that diffusion-generated echocardiograms may provide a practical approach to augmenting limited training data for selected cardiac imaging tasks and motivate further evaluation across clinical settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.