Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42779795›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Synthetic Echocardiograms from Diffusion Models in Rare Cardiovascular Disease.

Pengfei Lyu, Ricardo Henao, Lydia Coulter Kwee, Fred Zhangzhi Peng, Melissa Hurdle, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, Svati H Shah, Michel Georges Khouri, Anru Zhang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pengfei LyuDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ricardo HenaoDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Lydia Coulter KweeDuke Health Center for Public Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Fred Zhangzhi PengDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Melissa HurdleDuke Health Center for Public Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Sreekanth VemulapalliDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Svati H ShahDuke Health Center for Public Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4980-845X
Michel Georges KhouriDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Anru ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8721-5252

Funding

Machine Learning Guided Precision Genetic Testing for Identification of Monogenic Cardiovascular DisordersR01HL168940 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Svati H. Shah, Sreekanth Vemulapalli · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL168940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limited availability of imaging data for uncommon cardiovascular phenotypes constrains the development of robust imaging models. We evaluated whether class-conditional diffusion models can generate synthetic transthoracic echocardiograms that improve downstream cardiac imaging tasks. The primary application was cardiac amyloidosis detection in a Duke University cohort using a two-step classifier, with external analyses using EchoNet-Dynamic for image-fidelity assessment and EchoNet-LVH for wall-thickness phenotype classification. The Duke cohort was partitioned at the patient-encounter level into 70% training, 15% validation, and 15% test sets; generators were trained only on the training partition, augmentation levels were selected using validation AUROC, and final evaluation used held-out real test data. In the Duke all-view two-step analysis, adding synthetic images increased AUROC from 0.883 to 0.924, with an AUROC difference of 0.041 (95% CI, 0.013-0.069); in EchoNet-LVH, AUROC increased from 0.832 to 0.864, with an AUROC difference of 0.032 (95% CI, 0.021-0.044). Expert review found that synthetic images were sometimes difficult to identify as synthetic, but rated them lower for diagnostic adequacy. These findings suggest that diffusion-generated echocardiograms may provide a practical approach to augmenting limited training data for selected cardiac imaging tasks and motivate further evaluation across clinical settings.

Identifiers

PMID42779795
PMCPMC13596512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.