Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42779754›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

ssJSD: A Fusion of Sparsity and Spatial Information for HiC Single-Cell Clustering.

Sang Wan Lee, Shili Lin

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sang Wan LeeDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
Shili LinDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.ORCID 0000-0003-2467-4491

Funding

Omics analysis of three-dimensional transcriptional regulationR01GM114142 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI JIN, VICTOR, LIN, SHILI · 2015 to 2024
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell high-throughput chromatin conformation capture (scHiC) enables profiling three-dimensional genome architecture at cellular resolution, providing insights into cell-to-cell variability and cellular functions. Recent frameworks utilize spatial interaction patterns to derive dissimilarity measures for downstream tasks such as cell clustering. However, the inherent sparsity and ultra-high dimensionality of scHiC contact matrices pose significant challenges. A central hurdle is that existing measures typically treat all zeros without distinction, failing to differentiate biologically meaningful structural zeros (SZs) from technical dropouts. Here, we introduce ssJSD (spatial and sparsity informed Jensen-Shannon Divergence), a computational framework designed to explicitly account for scHiC-specific sparsity patterns. By integrating band-wise contact frequency profiles with SZ-induced sparsity matrices, ssJSD leverages both spatial interaction patterns and biological absence of contacts. We adopted two complementary integration strategies: an early fusion approach that concatenates information into a single representation, and a late fusion approach that integrates JSD-based dissimilarities through diverse averaging methods. Through simulations and applications to human cell lines and prefrontal cortex data, we demonstrate that ssJSD improves clustering accuracy and effectively distinguishes cell types. Our study indicates that integrating SZ patterns is important for accurately quantifying cell-to-cell variability in 3D genomics.

Indexed as

Cell clusteringData fusionJensen-Shannon divergenceSingle-cell HiCStructural zeros

Identifiers

PMID42779754
PMCPMC13596373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.