ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Transplanted hearts assimilate the recipient's biological age.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Despite the growing demand for transplantation, a shortage of donor organs persists, limiting access to this lifesaving procedure. To meet the increasing demand, organs are frequently transplanted across an age discrepancy between donor and recipients. Methods: We delineated biological age dynamics in heterochronic heart transplants performed in both mice and patients. We carried out multiomic profiling and applied advanced biomarkers of aging to understand the interactions between the transplanted organ and the host. Results: We show that the biological age of experimental heart transplants rapidly assimilates the age of recipients. Interestingly, this effect was limited to the grafted tissue without reciprocal effects on systemic biological age of the recipient. These effects were confirmed at the level of DNA methylation and gene expression. Extending our findings clinically using both omics and functional analyses, we show that the biological age of heterochronically transplanted hearts is strongly associated with the age of the recipient, rather than the donor, confirming the clinical relevance of our experimental findings. Conclusions: These data identify the systemic environment as a driving force on tissue biological age. The rejuvenation of older organs in young recipients suggests novel approaches to organ allocation that may expand the pool of transplantable organs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.