ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
MERIT: A No-Code Platform for Unifying High-Precision Cognitive Assessment Across Laboratory and Real-World Settings.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive tasks are moving from the laboratory onto participants' own devices. Browser runtimes make that move easy. Their stimulus timing, however, can vary by tens of milliseconds across devices. We asked how much timing error cognitive and neural measures can tolerate. We injected per-trial stimulus-timing jitter into a public EEG dataset (ERP CORE, N = 40) and re-measured three event-related potential components. Under a prespecified criterion of half the between-participant SD, the N170 tolerated jitter up to 15.8 ms, limited by peak-latency bias. The slower MMN and P3 tolerated more than 20 ms. The full jitter distribution predicted the loss. Heavy-tailed jitter cost less than Gaussian jitter of the same RMS. In simulated reaction-time data, the same tail shape determined whether platform error raised or lowered the ex-Gaussian τ, a candidate attentional biomarker. A single RMS timing figure therefore cannot tell whether a platform is adequate for these measures. We built the Mobile Experimental Research Investigative Toolkit (MERIT) to meet these requirements without code. Researchers design tasks in a visual builder that supports reaction-time, continuous-control, drawing, and sequential task families. A Unity engine embedded natively in the Curious iOS and Android apps runs the tasks. Measured with an optical sensor, inter-stimulus-interval SD was 0.71 to 0.96 ms on three current phones and tablets. It was 3.73 ms on a 2019 budget Android phone. Every device measured at least four times below the N170 ceiling. In the laboratory, the same task definition streams event markers to Lab Streaming Layer (LSL) for synchronized EEG and physiological recording. In the field, it runs on ecological momentary assessment schedules. Native mobile players, no-code builders, and EMA platforms each exist as separate systems. MERIT combines them, so the task characterized against brain and body recordings in the laboratory is the same task participants complete at home.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.