ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Anatomy of the Visual Word Form Area in Dyslexia.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Visual Word Form Area (VWFA), located in ventral occipitotemporal cortex, plays a critical role in skilled reading. Researchers have theorized that the VWFA develops in its specific anatomical location due to the convergence of major white matter tracts and proximity to functionally similar regions. This suggests that precise anatomical positioning may be crucial for optimal VWFA function. Previous research has identified several functional differences in this region between typical and struggling readers (i.e. dyslexia): struggling readers show weaker text-selective responses and often exhibit a smaller or even absent VWFA. However, it remains unexplored whether the precise anatomical location of this region also differs between typical and struggling readers. We tested whether VWFA anatomy differs between children with and without dyslexia (N=87). Participants completed a functional localizer, which we used to manually define the VWFA in each individual's native anatomy. We examined whether: (1) VWFA anatomical location relates to reading ability, (2) children with dyslexia show greater variability in VWFA location compared to typical readers, and (3) VWFA location with respect to white matter tracts relates to reading ability. Results reveal that, despite being smaller in children with dyslexia, there is no relationship between VWFA location and reading ability. Specifically, individual VWFA location relative to anatomy, relative to other's VWFAs, and relative to white matter tracts, is not related to reading ability. These findings suggest that while the VWFA's general anatomy may be facilitated by development, its precise location remains stable and unrelated to reading proficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.