ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Dynamics of mutators of arbitrary dominance in humans.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent findings in humans and other species have revealed the presence of "mutator" alleles that increase germline mutation rate across the genome. Such mutators are expected to be selected against because of the additional deleterious alleles that they generate, to a degree that will depend on how much they increase the mutation rate in heterozygotes and homozygotes. To describe their dynamics, we develop a population genetic model of mutation rate modifiers with arbitrary dominance coefficients, in which fitness effects stem from additional germline mutations. We then use it to interpret findings for the seven human mutators identified to date. For six of the seven known mutators, the observed frequencies are well fit by the model and thus consistent with purifying selection arising solely due to their effects on germline mutation rates, although also consistent with a wide range of parameters; in two, the observed frequencies are readily explained by purely recessive fitness effects. The exception is a variant in
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.