Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42779435›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2026

A multi-level framework for the functions of emotions and their expressions.

Laith Al-Shawaf, David M G Lewis, Elias Acevedo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laith Al-ShawafDepartment of Psychology, University of Colorado , Colorado Springs, CO 80918, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8600-0591
David M G LewisMurdoch University , Perth, WA 6150, Australia.
Elias AcevedoUniversity of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles, CA 90034, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces a framework for understanding the functions of emotion and emotion expression at multiple levels of analysis. The framework clarifies several key but sometimes overlooked conceptual distinctions in emotion science, including the distinctions between emotions and their expressions, the individual and social functions of emotions, and functions and benefits. This framework also integrates ultimate and proximate levels of analysis by showing how functional hypotheses lead to concrete, testable proximate predictions about how emotions work. By organizing these distinctions and levels of analysis, this framework provides a basis for asking precise questions and testing new hypotheses about the structure and function of emotions and their expressions. This article is part of the theme issue 'Mechanisms, development, phylogeny and functions of emotional expressions'.

Indexed as

EmotionsFacial ExpressionHumanscontextcoordinating mechanismemotionemotion expressionfacial expressionsfunctionlevels of analysisproximate and ultimate

Identifiers

PMID42779435
PMCPMC13601892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.