Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42779433›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2026

Vocal display rules in everyday life: when is it appropriate to laugh, sigh or scream?

Roza G Kamiloğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Vocal display rules in everyday life: when is it appropriate to laugh, sigh or scream?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Roza G KamiloğluDepartment of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1018-2595

Funding

Dutch Research Council (NWO) VI.Veni.241G.047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The appropriateness of common nonverbal vocalizations is guided by social norms, known as display rules. This preregistered, 7-day experience-sampling study examined how perceived appropriateness varies across situations. A total of 142 adults completed three surveys per day (2670 surveys total; 3821 vocalizations), rating appropriateness alongside situational cues and psychological situation characteristics. Laughter and sighs were most often judged appropriate, whereas screams and retches were least. Appropriateness was higher at home and in social places (e.g. parties) than in work/school or public settings (e.g. library), and higher with close ties than with weak ties or strangers. Formality and power were associated with lower appropriateness, whereas sociality and positivity were associated with higher appropriateness. Effects were vocalization-specific: for example, laughter was considered more appropriate in positive, social and brisk contexts, but less appropriate in formal and high-power contexts. By charting when and where vocalizations are judged acceptable, these findings outline situational principles of vocal display rules in everyday life. This article is part of the theme issue 'Mechanisms, development, phylogeny and functions of emotional expressions'.

Indexed as

CryingLaughterNonverbal CommunicationSocial BehaviorFemaleHumansMaledisplay rulesexperience samplingnonverbal vocalizationspsychological situation characteristicssituation cues

Identifiers

PMID42779433
PMCPMC13601882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.