ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2026
Smiling in time: the interactive development of infant smiling with mothers, fathers and strangers.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smiling in time: the interactive development of infant smiling with mothers, fathers and strangers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A developmental examination of the temporal dynamics of infant smiling during early social interaction is lacking. We ask how infants and adults influence each other's expressions of positive affect by examining the timing of transitions among dyadic states defined by the presence and absence of each partner's smiles. Fifty-eight infants interacted with their mothers, fathers and a stranger at 4 and 8 months. A survival analysis of the time course of infant (and adult partner) smiles and non-smiles indicated that infants initiated smiles and reciprocated smiles at lower rates than their adult partners, yet ended smiles at higher rates. Nevertheless, adult smiles were associated with higher infant smile rates, while infant smiles prolonged adult smiles, suggesting a dyadic path to mutual positivity. Eight-month-olds initiated smiles at higher rates than 4-month-olds when neither partner was smiling, suggesting increasing infant smiling initiative. Partner-specific patterns revealed selective infant responsiveness. Although strangers initiated and sustained smiles at higher rates than mothers, infants were more probably to reciprocate mother than stranger smiles. In the first year of life, infants showed a tendency to down-regulate positive affect expressions across age and context, as well as partner-specific smile reciprocation proclivities and a developmental increase in smile initiation. This article is part of the theme issue 'Mechanisms, development, phylogeny and functions of emotional expressions'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.