Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42779422›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2026

Developing kind emotions in caring environments.

Ruth Speidel, Tal Orlitsky, Marian S Schulz, Tina Malti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruth SpeidelCentre for Child Development, Mental Health, and Policy, University of Toronto Mississauga , Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Tal OrlitskyHumboldt Science Centre for Child Development, Leipzig University , Leipzig, SN, Germany.
Marian S SchulzHumboldt Science Centre for Child Development, Leipzig University , Leipzig, SN, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3032-9512
Tina MaltiCentre for Child Development, Mental Health, and Policy, University of Toronto Mississauga , Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8241-1230

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt FoundationAlexander von Humboldt Professorship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kind emotions (e.g. empathy for others, self-compassion and gratitude) motivate kind actions and involve understanding, appreciating or 'feeling with' both one's own and others' emotions. They are an essential capacity for humans' potential to care for fellow humans and non-human entities. How do such emotions evolve, and what type of caring environments and mechanisms are needed for their development? In this review, we provide insights into how children's kind emotions emerge, develop and are nurtured by caring environments. We begin by reviewing the development of kind emotions across the early years and identify consequences of kind emotions on prosociality and well-being. Next, we summarize research on the mechanisms and functions of caring environments in shaping the development of kind emotions, including caring relationships and practices of care across diverse relationships (e.g. with parents and peers) and layers of the ecosystem (e.g. familial, educational, societal and natural). Finally, we provide recommendations for future developmental research in this area. This article is part of the theme issue 'Mechanisms, development, phylogeny and functions of emotional expressions'.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentEmotionsEmpathySocial BehaviorChildHumanscaring relationshipsempathyflourishingkind emotionsprosocialityweb of care

Identifiers

PMID42779422
PMCPMC13601886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.