ArticleRenal failure2026
The efficacy of
Article in Renal failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) is frequently complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI). Although most patients recover from AKI with supportive care, some progress to chronic kidney disease (CKD). The incidence and determinants of CKD progression in patients with HFRS-AKI remain uncertain. Here, 99 patients with HFRS-AKI treated at Jinling Hospital were analyzed retrospectively to determine the rate of CKD progression and identify associated risk factors. Patients were divided into complete recovery (CR) and incomplete recovery (ICR) groups according to CKD progression. Baseline clinical and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. Overall, 27.3% of patients with HFRS-AKI progressed to CKD despite receiving supportive care. Facial flushing was more frequent in the ICR group than in the CR group (40.7% vs. 18.1%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.