Observational studyDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Reducing Weight With Intensive Dietary Support (REWIND) Programme on Type 2 Diabetes Remission.
Observational study in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Reducing Weight With Intensive Dietary Support (REWIND) Programme on Type 2 Diabetes Remission.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Observational
- Understanding Remission of Long-Term Conditions Through Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the real-world effectiveness of the Reducing Weight With Intensive Dietary Support (REWIND) programme, offering total diet replacement or low carbohydrate diet pathways, on weight loss, glycaemic control, glucose-lowering medication prescribing and remission of Type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted an observational, pre-post quasi-experimental analysis using primary care electronic health records from North West London. REWIND participants with ≥ 12 months of follow-up (n = 1051) were compared with eligible individuals who were not referred to the programme (n = 66 376). Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for baseline group differences and outcomes estimated as average treatment effects on the treated.
resultsAt 12 months, REWIND participation was associated with greater weight loss (-2.1 kg [95% CI: -2.7 to -1.5]), reduced glucose-lowering medication prescribing (-12.2% [-13.1 to -11.3]) and increased remission (+4.2% [3.9-4.5]) compared with controls, but no significant difference in glycaemic control. The increase in remission was greater among participants following the total diet replacement pathway (+6.9% [6.1-6.8]) than the low-carbohydrate pathway (+2.9% [2.6-3.2]). Programme completers experienced greater improvements across outcomes, including an +8.1% (7.8%, 8.5%) increase in remission compared with controls.
conclusionsParticipation in REWIND was associated with modest improvements in weight, medication use and diabetes remission compared with usual care. Greater improvements among programme completers suggest that sustaining engagement is an important challenge in achieving benefits from similar programmes in routine care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.