Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42779130›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Diagnostic performance and feasibility of classifying placental umbilical cord insertion during routine prenatal ultrasound.

Ine Hildershavn Moen, Synnøve Lian Johnsen, Jørg Kessler, Alexander Vietheer, Svein Rasmussen, Cathrine Ebbing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ine Hildershavn MoenSection for Fetal Medicine and Ultrasound, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5706-4959
Synnøve Lian JohnsenSection for Fetal Medicine and Ultrasound, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Jørg KesslerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Alexander VietheerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Svein RasmussenResearch Group for Pregnancy, Fetal Development and Birth, Department of Clinical Science2, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5789-2922
Cathrine EbbingSection for Fetal Medicine and Ultrasound, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAbnormal cord insertion (velamentous or marginal) is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, and guidelines recommend prenatal diagnosis when feasible. However, the diagnostic performance and feasibility of classification of the placental cord insertion in an ultrasound screening setting remain uncertain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of prenatal classification of placental cord insertion site. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis prospective observational study was conducted at a Norwegian tertiary center from May 2017 to August 2023. Pregnant women with singleton pregnancies attending the routine ultrasound scans were invited to participate and enrolled after written informed consent. During the scan, the distance between the umbilical cord insertion and the placental edge (the "test variable") was measured. At birth, cord insertion was categorized as normal, abnormal (velamentous (≤0 mm) or marginal (1-24 mm) from the placental edge), or unclassifiable. Diagnostic performance of the measured distance by ultrasound to predict insertion type at birth was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with adjustment for covariates in Bayesian logistic regression, including sonographer experience. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, including optimal thresholds (Youden and Closest top-left criteria), were estimated.

resultsIn total, 2859 examinations were carried out, and 2553 examinations in 1919 pregnancies were between 11 and 18 gestational weeks and included in the analyses. Of these, 634 had two examinations. Cord insertion site was classifiable in all but 14/2859 examinations (0.49%). The AUC for prenatal identification of abnormal cord insertion was 0.76. Using the Youden threshold, sensitivity was 0.64 and specificity 0.76; using the Closest top-left threshold, sensitivity was 0.69 and specificity 0.70. Negative predictive values exceeded 0.90, whereas positive predictive values (PPVs) were lower. Diagnostic performance was higher for velamentous cord insertion specifically (AUC = 0.89) than for abnormal insertion overall. Adjusting for additional covariates (operator experience and maternal characteristics) minimally affected AUC estimates.

conclusionsAssessment of the umbilical cord insertion during routine prenatal ultrasound was feasible and demonstrated high negative but limited PPV, suggesting that cord insertion assessment may be incorporated into routine antenatal imaging to support risk stratification.

Indexed as

diagnostic performancefeasibilityplacental cord insertionroutine ultrasound scanvasa previa

Identifiers

PMID42779130
PMCPMC13601763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.