ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Real-World Claims Data on Prescribed Drugs and the Associated Drug-Drug Interaction Risk in Sickle Cell Disease in the United States.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a debilitating hereditary hematologic disorder characterized by severe physical complications, including painful vaso-occlusive crises, chronic pain, multi-organ damage, and reduced life expectancy. Diverse medications are prescribed to treat SCD or manage its associated complications. However, no comprehensive resource for concomitant medication and drug-drug interaction (DDI) risk exists for people living with SCD. Here, we utilized real-world claims data from the Merative Commercial MarketScan Research Database to identify the 100 most prescribed drugs for adolescents and adults living with SCD in the United States with commercial health insurance. DDI risks were assessed by leveraging the CERTARA Drug Interaction Database. In total, 43/100 drugs on the list were associated with DDI risks. Inhibitors were more frequently represented than inducers, suggesting that interaction risk in this population may be driven primarily by inhibition-mediated mechanisms. CYP3A4 accounted for the largest proportion of identified interactions. The high prescription rates of the CYP3A4 substrates oxycodone (40%) and fentanyl (18.5%), associated with potentially serious clinical consequences due to DDIs, highlight the importance of considering CYP3A4 interaction risk during development of novel therapies for SCD. Overall, this analysis provides a population-level insight into prescription patterns and subsequent DDI risks for people living with SCD. We expect these findings to (1) create clinical DDI risk awareness for this population and (2) inform strategic planning of DDI assessments during development of novel therapies indicated for SCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.