Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42778988›Full record

ArticleCanadian review of sociology = Revue canadienne de sociologie2026

Rethinking Mistrust: Elements Toward a Situated Theory on Immigrant Workers.

Maude Arsenault, Daniel Côté

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian review of sociology = Revue canadienne de sociologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maude ArsenaultUniversité de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-5790
Daniel CôtéIRSST, Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3000-5622

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture 301325Fonds de recherche du Québec-Société et culture (FRQSC) # 301325Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du TravailInstitut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en Sécurité du travail (IRSST)Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 13010447Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) # 13010447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article explores mistrust as a socially situated phenomenon by using the care trajectories of injured immigrant workers in Québec as a conceptual entry point. Rather than focusing on the individual characteristics of trusters, it examines how mistrust emerges from a subjective evaluation of environments perceived as threatening. Drawing on a body of work on mistrust and trust, the article proposes a two-tiered model distinguishing between underlying mistrust, rooted in generalized social vulnerability, and directed distrust, focused on specific actors. The study identifies four key factors shaping perceptions of environmental threat: precariousness, lack of support, diminished recognition, and limited agency. Ethnographic cases highlight how these factors interact to produce mistrust, and how their presence or absence modulates its expression. The article also incorporates a distinction between mistrust and distrust to refine conceptual clarity. Though grounded in a specific empirical context-immigrant workers navigating Quebec's work injury rehabilitation system-the model is offered as a more generalizable analytical tool. By treating mistrust not as a deficit or pathology but as a rational, context-responsive orientation, this article contributes to the development of a situated theory of mistrust applicable across diverse social fields.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsOccupational InjuriesTrustHumansQuebecconceptual frameworkdistrusthealthcareimmigrant workersinstitutional dynamicsmistrustwork rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42778988
PMCPMC13601640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.