ArticleBMC health services research2026
The development process of a regional dementia strategy: a Delphi study and deliberative dialogues.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the past decade, numerous countries have adopted national dementia strategies to address the growing societal impact of dementia. In Germany, six federal states have regional strategies to address local demographic and structural challenges, such as those in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany's fastest shrinking and ageing federal state with the highest dementia prevalence. In 2022, the State Competence Center for Dementia Saxony-Anhalt was established to develop a comprehensive regional Dementia Strategy. The aim of this study was to generate consensus on the objectives required to ensure adequate care and improve the quality of life of people living with dementia and their families in Saxony-Anhalt. To achieve this, the study used a participatory approach to identify and prioritize strategic objectives for the regional Dementia Strategy.
methodsA mixed-method, two-phase participatory design was employed. First, in a two-round Delphi process ratings from nine interest-holder groups were collected, including people living with dementia, informal caregivers, professionals, policymakers, and civil society representatives. Second, deliberative dialogues explored selected non-consensus objectives. Consolidated objectives were thematically grouped and aligned with state ministries to ensure policy feasibility.
resultsIn total, 406 participants completed round 1, with 262 participants completing round 2; 18 participants attended deliberative dialogues. Of 88 initial objectives, 47 reached consensus in round 1, 21 more in round 2, and seven were refined and validated through deliberative dialogues. The remaining 26 non-consensus items were thematically aggregated into broader strategic objectives. After ministerial alignment, the final Dementia Strategy comprises 40 strategic objectives across four main topics: social participation, medical and nursing care, support for people with dementia and informal caregivers, and promotion of dementia research. Participants also identified structural challenges, including service shortages, workforce limitations, bureaucratic barriers, and caregiver burden. These were documented as contextual factors relevant to implementation.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of a structured participatory approach for regional dementia strategy development. The resulting strategy provides a foundation for future action, while successful implementation and the development of an implementation strategy will be essential to translate agreed objectives into practice. The approach may serve as a transferable model for evidence-informed and participatory health policy development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.