Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42778866›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026

Radiation Oncology Training for Non-Oncology Specialists: A National Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a French Cross-Specialty Program.

Pierre Loap, Kamel Debbi, Anne Laprie, Gilles Créhange, Laurent Zelek, Florence Huguet, Rosine Guimbaud, Yazid Belkacemi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pierre Loap *Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, 75005, France. pierre.loap@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8863-8110
Kamel Debbi *Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, APHP, UPEC, Créteil, France.
Anne LaprieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Université Toulouse, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.
Gilles CréhangeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, 75005, France.
Laurent ZelekMedical and Thoracic Oncology Department, Hopital Avicenne, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France.
Florence HuguetDepartment of Radiation Oncology, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Rosine GuimbaudDigestive Medical Oncology Department, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Yazid BelkacemiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital, APHP, UPEC, Créteil, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The French Formation Spécialisée Transversale in oncology (FST), introduced in 2017, aims to provide oncological competencies to residents from non-oncology specialties through a one-year curriculum combining theoretical oncology teaching with two mandatory six-month rotations in medical and radiation oncology. Evidence regarding the educational outcomes of the radiation oncology part of the program remains limited. We conducted a national cross-sectional mixed-methods study between June and August 2025 among physicians who had completed the FST radiation oncology rotation between 2018 and 2025 (n = 203 respondents) and radiation oncology supervisors (n = 16 respondents). Primary outcomes included trainee satisfaction across nine radiation therapy (RT) learning domains (10-point scale), supervisor-assessed competencies, and post-training professional engagement. Multivariable analyses explored predictors of satisfaction and outcomes. Participants had a mean age of 29.6 ± 2.4 years, 65.5% were female, and the most represented specialties were hepato-gastroenterology (33.5%) and pulmonology (30.5%). Satisfaction varied markedly across domains, with highest ratings for patient communication (7.45 ± 2.47; 75.4% ≥7) and lowest for clinical research training (4.02 ± 2.68; 24.1% ≥7). General satisfaction differed by specialty, ranging from 7.90 ± 1.15 in neurology (85.7% high satisfaction) to 5.67 ± 2.05 in hepato-gastroenterology (32.4%). In retrospective supervisor assessments, theoretical RT knowledge was rated at 3.06 ± 1.39 for the beginning of the rotation and 7.19 ± 1.05 for rotation completion. Specialty-relevant RT competencies received the highest ratings (8.00 ± 1.26; 87.5% ≥7). High oncological engagement (≥ 70% clinical time) was observed in 55.7% of participants and showed no significant association with rotation satisfaction (r = 0.08, p = 0.25). The FST radiation oncology rotation was associated with heterogeneous trainee experiences across domains and specialties. Trainees reported strong satisfaction for communication and toxicity management but limited satisfaction for research training and autonomy, while supervisors reported favorable assessments of theoretical knowledge and specialty-relevant competencies at rotation completion. These findings support the development of specialty-adaptive curricula within a standardized national training framework.

Indexed as

Cross-specialty oncology trainingEducational outcomesGraduate medical educationMultidisciplinary oncologyRadiation oncology education

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.