Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42778828›Full record

ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2026

Practical Pipetting Optimization Strategies for Accurate Concentration Measurement of High-Concentration Protein Formulations.

Shang-Yin Wu, Yun-Jie He, Ci Qian, Si-Ru Zhong, Hong-Xing Xiao, Changyun Xiong, Bin Di, Wei-Jie Fang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shang-Yin WuInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5158-0756
Yun-Jie HeTaizhou Research Institute of Zhejiang University, Taizhou, 318000, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5967-7673
Ci QianZhejiang Bioray Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Taizhou, 317000, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4607-0405
Si-Ru ZhongTOBiopharm Biotech Co., Ltd, Nantong, 226100, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7466-1641
Hong-Xing XiaoTOBiopharm Biotech Co., Ltd, Nantong, 226100, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4713-9249
Changyun XiongJunjian Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Ningbo, 315000, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4423-2258
Bin DiSchool of Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1907-1736
Wei-Jie FangInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. wjfang@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3375-7360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-concentration protein formulations for subcutaneous administration have developed rapidly, while viscosity-related pipetting errors remain a key bottleneck for accurate protein concentration quantification, with commercial detection instruments showing significant limitations in direct measurement of these samples. Here, we developed two pipetting-optimized quantification strategies using two high-concentration monoclonal antibody formulations with distinct viscosities as models: a motorized continuous pipette-based direct measurement method and a weight-corrected method. We validated the high accuracy and repeatability of the motorized continuous pipette for high-viscosity liquid handling, and systematically compared the performance of our optimized methods with the traditional manual pipetting method and three mainstream commercial protein analyzers. Direct measurements using the three evaluated analyzers showed formulation-dependent deviations under the tested conditions. Both optimized workflows improved pipetting precision and provided concentration estimates with improved repeatability for the two high-concentration mAb formulations examined. These findings support motorized pipetting and weight correction as practical options when viscosity compromises volumetric transfer, while their applicability to other protein modalities and formulations with intermediate viscosity requires further validation.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalProteinsChemistry, PharmaceuticalDrug CompoundingReproducibility of ResultsViscosityAntibodies, MonoclonalProteinsconcentration analysishigh-concentration protein formulationmethod validationmotorized continuous pipettepipetting accuracy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.