Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42778804›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026

Interoception as a Mechanism Linking Anxiety, Cardiovascular Disease, and their Co-Occurrence.

Brittany L Keller, Samantha G Farris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brittany L KellerDepartment of Psychology, University of New Jersey, 1 Spring Street, Suite 200, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Samantha G FarrisDepartment of Psychology, University of New Jersey, 1 Spring Street, Suite 200, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA. samantha.farris@rutgers.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2567-2463

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review summarizes current research on interoception in cardiovascular disease (CVD), highlights the clinical implications of interoceptive processes in CVD management, and provides recommendations for prescribing symptom monitoring based on findings. RECENT

findingsCompared to healthy controls, individuals with CVD demonstrate low actual interoceptive accuracy and high perceived interoceptive attention, though more rigorous methodology is needed. This interoceptive profile, particularly high interoceptive attention, has also been recently found to be predictive of health anxiety. Though interoception research has primarily utilized cardiac-based measurements, there is a dearth of research examining interoception in individuals with CVD. Research that has been conducted in this population has found that individuals with CVD show interoceptive profiles that might increase risk of health anxiety, though more work is needed. We recommend that providers give specific instructions for symptom monitoring (e.g., duration, method, signs to seek medical attention) to minimize uncertainty during CVD management.

Indexed as

AnxietyCardiovascular DiseasesInteroceptionAttentionHumansAnxietyCardiovascular diseaseHypervigilanceInteroceptive accuracyInteroceptive attention

Identifiers

PMID42778804
PMCPMC13601110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.