ArticleEnvironmental management2026
Multi-Year Regional-Scale Efficacy Assessment of Two Herbicides for Treatment of Invasive Floating Aquatic Vegetation in a California Estuary.
Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive aquatic macrophytes are a major threat to estuarine ecosystems globally. This study examined the efficacy of a program for treating invasive Floating Aquatic Vegetation (FAV) using two herbicides, glyphosate and 2,4- Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), over two five-year periods. The efficacy of both these herbicides has rarely been studied in tidal aquatic environments that are much more challenging to treat. This study combined multi-year image datasets, spray location and herbicide application data to examine the efficacy of the treatment program at the scale of the full ecosystem in a tidally dynamic estuary. The objectives of the study were 1) to determine if the herbicides type, application rate and frequency had an impact on efficacy, 2) if efficacy depended on the kind of habitat that was treated and the treatment history of the site, and finally, 3) if the impact lasted years after treatment. The results show that within the year of application, probability of FAV presence reduced as herbicide application rate increased. Both herbicide treatments were most effective in slow-flow shallow open-water habitats, and least effective in fast-flowing channel habitats. Treating with glyphosate had legacy effects that were detectable even three years after treatment but only in some habitats. For either herbicide, treating at a higher concentration in fewer visits was more effective than treating at a lower concentration over multiple visits to the same site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.