ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Complications following operative versus nonoperatively managed isolated distal third ulna shaft fractures: a retrospective single-institution cohort study.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes of operatively versus nonoperatively managed isolated distal third ulna fractures.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study. Operatively and nonoperatively managed isolated distal third ulna shaft fractures on forearm radiographs in adult patients with a minimum of six-week follow-up were identified at an academic level 1 trauma center over seven years from 2017 to 2024. Outcomes included rates of radiographic evidence of union, pain scores, nonunion, tendinopathies, removal of hardware, or heterotopic ossification at final follow-up. Outcomes were compared between cases managed operatively and those managed nonoperatively.
resultsA total of 56 isolated distal third ulna shaft fractures were identified with a mean follow-up duration of 30.5 weeks, including 12 (21.4%) managed operatively and 44 (78.6%) managed nonoperatively. The mean age was 49.0 years in the nonoperative group and 38.6 years in the operative group (p = 0.115), and the proportions of males were higher in the nonoperative group (61.4% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.006). At final follow-up, radiographic evidence of union was present in 77.3% of nonoperative cases and 91.7% of operative cases (p = 0.266). The complication rate was lower in the nonoperative group (15.9% vs. 41.7%), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.054).
conclusionsComplication and radiographic union rates were similar in isolated fractures of the distal third ulnar shaft managed operatively and nonoperatively. Both nonoperative and operative management are acceptable treatment options in appropriately selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.