ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Early contrast esophagram after anti-reflux surgery: use, perceived value, and impact on discharge among foregut specialists.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly postoperative esophageal contrast studies after anti-reflux and foregut surgery are used variably, and the value of routine testing remains uncertain. This study surveyed foregut surgeons regarding practice patterns, indications, perceived yield, and discharge impact of early contrast imaging.
methodsAn anonymous web-based questionnaire was distributed through an institutional listserv, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Foregut and Flexible Endoscopy Committees, and the American Foregut Society DocMatter community. Respondents reported practice characteristics, procedure-specific use of early (< 72 h) contrast imaging, indications for selective imaging, perceived management impact, and discharge consequences. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics.
resultsSixty-six surgeons responded, 97% performed foregut surgery. Most practiced in academic or hybrid settings (77%) and were fellowship trained in minimally invasive surgery (59%) and/or foregut/advanced gastrointestinal surgery (63%). Intraoperative endoscopy was used always or most of the time by 79%. Routine early contrast imaging was uncommon after primary procedures, including sliding hiatal hernia repair (22%), paraesophageal hernia repair (28%), complete fundoplication (23%), partial fundoplication (23%), magnetic sphincter augmentation (26%), consecutive transoral incisionless fundoplication (30%), and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (30%). Redo anti-reflux surgery prompted more frequent testing, with 44% reporting routine imaging. Leading triggers for selective imaging were intraoperative concern or injury (88%), early oral intolerance or dysphagia (69%), and atypical anatomy (46%). Most respondents (81%) estimated that only 0-5% of studies changed management. When management changed, diet modification (41%) and return to the operating room (30%) were most common. Thirty percent reported discharge delays in > = 10% of patients, usually by 6-24 h.
conclusionsRoutine early contrast imaging after anti-reflux surgery is uncommon among foregut specialists and is usually reserved for redo operations or specific clinical concerns. Respondents perceived low actionable yield and discharge delays in a subset of patients, supporting selective use in straightforward cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42778778What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.