Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42778760›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026

Pharmacological content in the German tabloid newspaper BILD: Comparison with DIE ZEIT.

Ramona Kramersmeyer, Bastian Schirmer, Roland Seifert

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ramona KramersmeyerHannover Medical School, Institute of Pharmacology, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany.
Bastian SchirmerHannover Medical School, Institute of Pharmacology, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany.
Roland SeifertHannover Medical School, Institute of Pharmacology, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany. seifert.roland@mh-hannover.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The background to this work is society's growing interest in medical and pharmacological content. Tabloid media such as BILD have a massive reach through both print and online media, which contributes significantly to the formation of public opinion. The tabloid press is often classified as an untrustworthy source and judged to be biased. Therefore, this study will focus on the question of linguistic and thematic patterns in the reporting of a tabloid medium (BILD) and its differences and similarities with a quality medium (DIE ZEIT). For the analysis, 100 articles were selected from BILD.de based on clearly defined criteria and parameters. A formal and content analysis of the articles was carried out with regard to text structure, content, and comprehensibility. BILD presents current facts in a well-researched, easily understandable, and neutral manner. The most frequently discussed drugs are those used in the fields of pain pharmacology, immunopharmacology, treatment of bacterial infections, sex hormones, and neuropsychiatric disorders. BILD tends to focus on drug groups that are of interest to its main readership and that the frequency with which these topics are covered does not correspond to prescription figures and disease prevalence in Germany. 62% of the BILD articles provided information about adverse drug reactions and 93% mentioned the indication. There were weaknesses in the explanation of modes of action (7%) and in the mention of contraindications (18%) and interactions (3%). Both contraindications and interactions were mentioned simultaneously in 1% of the articles. BILD provides more frequently information about indications and Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs), contraindications and interactions, while DIE ZEIT discusses modes of action more often. BILD goes into more detail in 76% of the drug names defined in the articles, while DIE ZEIT does so in 59% of cases. Drug groups, on the other hand, are discussed in 24% of BILD articles and in 41% of DIE ZEIT articles. This study illustrates that even a tabloid newspaper can be used as a source of basic information on pharmacological content and that the information content in certain subject areas is better than in a quality newspaper such as DIE ZEIT. The analysis thus shows that successful science communication is not tied to a particular medium, but to the quality of the communication.

Indexed as

Content analysisDrug informationMedia analysisPharmacologyTabloid journalism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.