Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42778719›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026

Molecular imaging tracers targeting c-MET: a systematic review of preclinical evidence and clinical translation.

Rick W A Verdijk, Stevie M van der Mierde, Nataliia Berehova, Maarten P van Meerbeek, Oscar R Brouwer, Henk G van der Poel, Fijs W B van Leeuwen, Tessa Buckle

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rick W A VerdijkDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stevie M van der MierdeScientific Information Service, Netherlands Cancer Institute- Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nataliia BerehovaDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten P van MeerbeekInterventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
Oscar R BrouwerDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fijs W B van LeeuwenDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa BuckleDepartment of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. T.Buckle@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2980-6895

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-MET) is an emerging target for molecular imaging owing to its widespread overexpression across multiple cancer types. This systematic review evaluated radioactive and fluorescent c-MET-targeting tracers in preclinical and clinical studies, focussing on their translational potential and imaging performance.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A PubMed, Embase, and Scopus search for studies evaluating radioactive or fluorescent c-MET-targeting tracers was complemented with expert-suggested reports. Tracer characteristics, imaging performance, and safety data were extracted.

resultsFifty preclinical and thirteen clinical reports were included, comprising 62 distinct c-MET-targeting tracers across several compound classes. Only four peptide-based tracers progressed to clinical evaluation: the fluorescent tracers EMI-137 and cMBP-ICG, and the PET tracers ⁶⁸Ga-EMP-100 and ⁶⁸Ga-MetP. EMI-137 (8 studies) enabled fluorescence-guided tumour visualisation (tumour-to-background ratios; TBRs 1.3-9.7) and identified additional malignant lesions in selected applications. Although tracer uptake generally corresponded with c-MET expression, diagnostic performance was limited by uptake in benign c-MET-expressing tissues, yielding a sample-size weighted average sensitivity and specificity of 81.7% and 39.3%. cMBP-ICG (2 studies), evaluated exclusively in oral cavity cancer, demonstrated improved discrimination between malignant and benign tissue and outperformed conventional assessment for biopsy-site selection, reporting TBRs of 2.7-4.1 and a weighted average sensitivity and specificity of 85.5% and 91.1%. The PET tracers ⁶⁸Ga-EMP-100 (2 studies) and ⁶⁸Ga-MetP (1 study) demonstrated feasibility for whole-body c-MET PET imaging, with the latter additionally showing a positive correlation between tumour uptake and immunohistochemical c-MET expression. All four tracers showed favourable safety, with only mild adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONTARGETING TRACER PIPELINE. NUMBERS REPRESENT DISTINCT: Despite extensive preclinical development, only four peptide-based tracers have progressed to clinical evaluation. Clinical evidence supports the feasibility of c-MET-targeted molecular imaging but remains limited by methodological heterogeneity, small sample sizes, limited biological validation, and variable diagnostic performance. Larger, standardised studies are needed to establish the added clinical value and broader applicability of c-MET-targeting tracers in molecular imaging.

Indexed as

C-METDiagnostic imagingFluorescence imagingImage-guided surgeryMesenchymal-Epithelial Transition FactorMolecular imagingTumour-specific tracer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.