ArticlePediatric research2026
Early identification of Prader-Willi syndrome in newborns using facial phenotype-based machine learning.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExisting facial models for Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) demonstrate limited accuracy in newborns with subtle facial dysmorphism.
methodsPhotographs of children from a public platform (training cohort) and of newborns from Children's Hospital of Fudan University (validation cohort) were used for feature comparison. Models were developed using six algorithms with three feature sets (Complete-, Top-10, and ClinSel-) in the training cohort. Model performance, calibration, feature importance, and sensitivity analysis were assessed. External validation via threshold re-estimation was compared with Face2Gene.
resultsOf 113 children (21 [19%] PWS), RF and AdaBoost gained the highest Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve across all feature sets. RF Complete-set model achieved highest sensitivity (mean [95% CI], 0.97 [0.84-1.00]) with 0.95 specificity (95% CI, 0.83-1.00) and was well calibrated. Age, face width, and upper lip-related features were important features. Four previously unreported features (jaw symmetry, chin, nose, and jaw widths) were identified. Sensitivity analysis showed 26 facial features contribute more than age. In external validation (10 PWS newborns and 13 controls), RF Complete-set model achieved comparable sensitivity (0.80 vs. 0.70) and significantly higher specificity (0.77 vs. 0.15) at a false positive rate ≤0.25 compared with Face2Gene.
conclusionsRF Complete-set model demonstrates potential for neonatal PWS identification. IMPACT: Facial phenotype-based machine learning models for identifying Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) in newborns facilitate early detection of PWS before genetic testing. Models achieved comparable sensitivity but higher specificity than Face2Gene, providing a favorable tool for PWS. Four previously unreported facial features-jaw symmetry, chin, nose, and jaw widths-expand the PWS facial phenotype. Models trained on children successfully identified PWS newborns after threshold adjustment, showing the value of reusing pediatric data when newborn samples are limited. Pilot validation in newborns with 0.80 sensitivity and 0.77 specificity supports the feasibility of machine learning-based screening for genetic syndromes.
Identifiers
42778693What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.