ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2026
Modelling the tail-phase pharmacokinetics of long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine from early pregnancy to postpartum at steady state.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing Maternal Health with Long-Acting Therapeutics: Priorities, Efficacy and Safety Considerations, and Emerging Technologies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine combination (LA-CAB/RPV) is approved for HIV treatment whilst LA-CAB alone is approved for HIV prevention, both in adults. However, individuals who become pregnant might prefer to discontinue it due to lack of definitive data on safety. The aim of this study was to characterise the tail-phase maternal and fetal pharmacokinetics of LA-CAB/RPV following discontinuation at steady-state early in pregnancy using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling. A virtual population of non-pregnant women (n = 100 per scenario) initiated intramuscular injections of LA-CAB/RPV at the approved dosage and continued maintenance dose (400/600 mg once monthly or 600/900 mg once every two months) until steady state. We simulated discontinuation at steady state after only one injection during pregnancy. Tail-phase pharmacokinetics of CAB and RPV from LA injections were characterised during gestation and until 64 weeks postmenstrual age. Pharmacokinetic tails of LA-CAB/RPV were driven by the residual drug in the muscle depot which stabilised at steady state and reduced steadily upon dosing discontinuation. Upon discontinuation of the monthly dosing, predicted median (IQR) maternal plasma concentrations for LA-CAB were 415 (386-448) ng/mL at delivery and 125 (115-139) ng/mL at 64 weeks postmenstrual age. For LA-RPV, these were 11.6 (11.0-12.6) ng/mL and 7.84 (7.30-8.49) ng/mL at delivery and at 64 weeks postmenstrual age, respectively. Pharmacokinetic tails of LA-CAB/RPV extend to several months postpartum, with levels falling below established minimum effective concentration in most women after gestation week 33. Potential strategies to minimise potential risks associated with LA-CAB/RPV discontinuation in this population are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.