ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2026
Diagnosis and management of Silver-Russell syndrome: second international consensus statement.
Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This international Consensus Statement updates 2016 guidelines for diagnosis and management of individuals with Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS), using a Delphi-like process to reach agreement through iterative expert discussions, based on published data and/or expert opinion. Individuals referred with suspected SRS show substantial clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Advances in genomic and epigenomic technology highlight the need for strict, primarily molecular, criteria for diagnosis, which should be made in those with maternal uniparental disomy for chromosome 7 (upd(7)mat) or 11p15 loss of methylation at H19/IGF2:intergenic differentially methylated region (IG-DMR) (due to an imprinting change, copy number variant or upd(11)mat). Molecular stratification enables tailoring of care pathways towards specific genetic and/or epigenetic subgroups. More widely, recommendations are relevant to other growth-related imprinting disorders (including Temple syndrome) and conditions affecting the insulin-like growth factor 2 pathway. An expert, multidisciplinary approach is required, focusing on growth failure, early severe feeding difficulties, later possible rapid weight gain, abnormal body composition, gastrointestinal problems, hypoglycaemia, insulin resistance, accelerated puberty, body asymmetry, neurocognitive issues and psychosocial challenges. Evidence published since the first Consensus Statement highlights the increased risk of metabolic disease from adolescence into adulthood. These updated recommendations have important implications for accurate diagnosis and optimal life-long management of individuals with SRS.
Identifiers
42778655What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.