ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
AI-enabled multi-omics pharmacogenomic modeling guides resistance-aware multitarget optimization of venetoclax therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains difficult to treat because profound molecular heterogeneity enables rapid adaptive resistance to targeted therapy. We developed an AI-driven pharmacogenomic pipeline that integrates genomic, transcriptomic, epigenetic, and clinical features to predict patient-specific response to venetoclax and translate resistance-associated signals into actionable therapeutic hypotheses. Across internal and external cohorts, the deep learning model showed strong discrimination and generalization (AUROC 0.84-0.90), produced calibrated probabilities, and stratified overall survival independent of standard prognostic factors. Explainable modeling (SHAP) identified mechanistically coherent drivers of sensitivity and resistance: high BCL2 and apoptotic priming favored response, whereas MCL1 upregulation, TP53 disruption, and RAS/MAPK activation were dominant resistance programs. Translating these findings into therapy design, network-based modeling and in silico perturbation prioritized rational combinations expected to block escape routes, including venetoclax plus MCL1 inhibition (e.g., AZD5991-class inhibitors), venetoclax plus FLT3 inhibition (e.g., gilteritinib-class agents) in signaling-driven disease, and venetoclax plus p53-axis modulation (e.g., MDM2 inhibition) in TP53-altered contexts. Structural candidate evaluation using ensemble docking provided supportive drug-target interaction evidence for prioritized dependencies. Together, these results establish a clinically interpretable, resistance-aware AI framework for precision optimization of venetoclax-based combination therapy in AML.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.