ArticleHeredity2026
Genetic covariance between plant biparental populations: concept and estimation.
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Covariances between relatives, between traits evaluated in the same environment, and between the values for the same trait in different environments have long been exploited in plant and animal breeding. An assumption underlying these covariances is that individuals belong to a single population or that populations have homogeneous covariances. This assumption is routinely violated, yet a framework for defining and estimating the covariance between populations is lacking. Our objective was to develop and validate a framework for estimating the genetic covariance between plant biparental populations via their molecular marker effects. We derived an analytical method to estimate variances and covariances between such populations, then validated it in simulated datasets and in a maize (Zea mays L.) dataset from a commercial breeding program. The simulated populations confirmed the method's expected behavior, whereas the maize dataset showed trait- and population-specific patterns in (co)variance. Our method requires the following inputs that can all be estimated or approximated: marker effects for each population; a linkage map; linkage phase information; and the inbreeding coefficient of the populations. The covariance between populations has potential applications not only in genomewide prediction, but also in non-breeding fields such as ecology and domestication.
Identifiers
42778628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.