Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42778621›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Near-term increased exposure to political risk for African power trades.

Teresa Bonserio, Angelo Carlino, Matteo Giuliani, Andrea Castelletti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Teresa BonserioDepartment of Electronics, Information, and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9236-0499
Angelo CarlinoDepartment of Electronics, Information, and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8403-9070
Matteo GiulianiDepartment of Electronics, Information, and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4780-9347
Andrea CastellettiDepartment of Electronics, Information, and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy. andrea.castelletti@polimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7923-1498

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 101003722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicts and socio-political instability plague electricity security in many African countries, hindering a transition to a net-zero emissions energy system. Established large-scale energy system planning approaches, relying on least-cost optimization models, regularly neglect the impact of political turmoil on energy security. This study assesses how six cost-optimal energy transition strategies for Africa might be affected by future socio-political instability and power trade volumes through a measure of power trade-related political risk. Our findings indicate that the most vulnerable period for Africa is the first half of the 2020-2030 decade, with socio-political risk hotspots in Western, Southern, and Central-Eastern Africa. Different socio-demographic, climatic and hydrological regime assumptions influence the distribution of socio-political risk across different regions, as countries uniquely adapt to future scenarios. These findings underscore the crucial need to integrate socio-political factors into energy systems planning, ensuring that transition strategies are flexible and cognizant of the involved risks.

Identifiers

PMID42778621
PMCPMC13601524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.