Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42778585›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Causal inference for multiple risk factors and diseases from genomics data.

Nick Machnik, Mahdi Mahmoudi, Malgorzata Borczyk, Ilse Krätschmer, Markus J Bauer, Matthew R Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nick Machnik *Institute Of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria. nick.machnik@ist.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-6617-9742
Mahdi Mahmoudi *Faculty of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3520-0382
Malgorzata BorczykLaboratory of Pharmacogenomics, Maj Institute of Pharmacology PAS, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4304-8384
Ilse KrätschmerInstitute Of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5636-9259
Markus J BauerBoehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG, Vienna, Austria.
Matthew R RobinsonInstitute Of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria. matthew.robinson@ist.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-8813

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) PCEGP3-181181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mendelian randomization, the standard instrument variable causal-inference approach for genomics, can be severely biased by inadequate selection of appropriate instrument variables and horizontal pleiotropy. We introduce Causal Inference GWAS, a graphical approach that selects genetic instruments from summary statistics controlling for linkage and pleiotropy, accommodates rare variants and binary outcomes, distinguishes direct from indirect risk factors in high dimensions, and flags latent confounding. Applied to 9 risk factors, 4 metabolic disease outcomes, and 8.4M variants across 458,747 UK Biobank individuals, our method runs in 20 minutes, identifying only 696 genome-wide valid instruments. We replicate nearly all previously reported risk factor-outcome paths, but find that most are indistinguishable from unmeasured confounding. This suggests robust biobank causal inference will require longitudinal and family data to resolve temporal precedence from reverse causation. Our approach offers a principled first step toward screening genuine causal signal from phenotypic correlation in biobank data.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsCausalityGenetic PleiotropyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk FactorsUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID42778585
PMCPMC13601610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.