ArticleNature communications2026
Single-cell mapping of chromosome breaks identifies multiple fragile site classes with distinct DNA replication timing landscapes.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Common fragile sites (CFSs) are genomic regions susceptible to chromosome breaks. However, because they were identified using cell populations, low-frequency fragile sites (non-CFSs) could have been overlooked. Here we perform single-cell genome-wide mapping and classification of aphidicolin-induced chromosome breaks. In human osteosarcoma cells, 42% of breaks exhibit features of CFSs. The remaining 58% are non-CFSs that are 'rare' and replicate throughout the S-phase. Among non-CFSs, we identify early-S replicating breaks associated with transcription-replication conflicts, as well as two additional break classes. One is dependent on transcription and coincides with early-to-late-S replication timing (RT) transition regions, while another class exhibits late-S RT with its frequency increasing upon transcription inhibition. Intriguingly, we find that different RT landscapes are associated with distinct aphidicolin-induced RT behavior and break classes. Our data reveal the frequencies, RT landscapes, and mechanistic differences among distinct break classes, providing a comprehensive view of genomic regions prone to breakage under replication stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.