ArticleNature communications2026
Multi-source agent-based modeling to optimize influenza mitigation strategies in Hong Kong.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-source agent-based modeling to optimize influenza mitigation strategies in Hong Kong.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seasonal influenza control faces challenges from variable vaccine effectiveness and uncertain non-pharmaceutical intervention (NPI) performance. While vaccination remains the primary strategy, its effectiveness varies between vaccine-matched and mismatched seasons. Increased post-COVID-19 NPI acceptance enhances influenza control feasibility, yet optimal combination approaches remain poorly understood. We use an agent-based model to analyze influenza transmission across six seasons in Hong Kong (2009-2013) with varying epidemic characteristics. We integrate surveillance, serological, and school absenteeism data for calibration, enabling accurate estimation of reported and unreported infections. We evaluate age-targeted vaccination, staying home when sick, mask use, and school-based interventions across diverse real-world scenarios. Compared to baseline, child vaccination consistently outperforms other strategies, with targeting those under 12 yielding the greatest population-level attack rate reduction (up to 8.5% relative reduction per 100,000 vaccinated). Among NPIs, 40% mask coverage reduces attack rates by 18%-43%, comparable to 25% of symptomatic individuals staying home. During vaccine-mismatched seasons, combining high-coverage mask use and staying home reduces attack rates by 79%-84%. High-coverage school-based vaccination is more effective than closures, reducing student attack rates by up to 85% versus 33% for 14-day closures. Our multi-source calibration approach provides robust evidence for prioritizing child vaccination and strategic NPI combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.