ReviewSignal transduction and targeted therapy2026
Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.
Review in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a rapidly expanding class of targeted cancer therapeutics that combine the high selectivity of monoclonal antibodies with the potent cytotoxic activity of small-molecule drugs. Their clinical success relies on the simultaneous optimization of multiple interdependent parameters, including antigen selection, antibody engineering, linker chemistry, and payload pharmacology, which limits the effectiveness of traditional empirical approaches. In this context, recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and computational biophysics are transforming the rational design of ADCs. AI enables large-scale integration of genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data to identify tumor-selective, surface-accessible antigens and to support patient stratification strategies. Deep learning models enhance antibody engineering by predicting structure, affinity, stability, and developability, while generative algorithms accelerate affinity maturation and specificity optimization. Computational prediction of linker design and conjugation sites improves plasma stability, controlled payload release, and drug-to-antibody ratio, whereas graph-based neural networks facilitate the selection and optimization of cytotoxic payloads with favorable potency, membrane permeability, and bystander effects. Complementary molecular dynamics simulations provide atomistic insight into antibody conformation, linker flexibility, and payload interactions, enabling a deeper mechanistic understanding of ADC stability and function. At the translational level, hybrid physiologically based pharmacokinetic-AI models and digital twin simulations enable virtual evaluation of tumor penetration, systemic exposure and safety, ultimately supporting dose optimization and more efficient clinical development. Although this review places particular emphasis on the application of these approaches in oncology, emerging ADC strategies beyond cancer-including autoimmune, neurodegenerative, cardiovascular, and metabolic diseases-are also discussed. Together, these computational strategies represent a convergence of machine intelligence and molecular biology that is poised to fundamentally transform ADC development, enabling safer, more precise, and effective therapies across oncology and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.