ArticleEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
Maternal and fetal outcomes associated with CFTR modulator use during pregnancy: a scoping review.
Article in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With major therapeutic advances driven by cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators (CFTRm), increasing numbers of women with cystic fibrosis (CF) are living into adulthood and pursuing pregnancy. Women with CF may face pregnancy-related challenges that influence maternal and fetal outcomes. However, long-term data regarding the safety and effectiveness of CFTRm use during pregnancy remain limited.This scoping review aimed to evaluate the existing literature on the effects of CFTRm use in women with CF during pregnancy and the postpartum period, as well as the potential impact on the developing fetus. We analysed clinical studies, registry data and related literature published between 2003 and 2025 to assess reported differences in lung function, birth weight, pregnancy and neonatal complications, mode of delivery and screening biomarkers among pregnancies in women with CF treated with ivacaftor, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, tezacaftor/ivacaftor or elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, compared with pregnancies not exposed to CFTRm.Available evidence suggests that elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor may improve maternal health through better lung function and nutritional status, while inadvertent fetal drug exposure has not been clearly associated with serious adverse outcomes. Reported fetal and neonatal outcomes following maternal CFTRm therapy have generally been reassuring. However, long-term effects in exposed children remain uncertain. There is also insufficient evidence to establish the safety of infant exposure or prolonged maternal CFTRm use during lactation. This review highlights the need for future studies evaluating dose optimisation, long-term follow-up of infants and children, and integration of registry data to better define the safety and effectiveness of CFTRm use during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.