Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42778201›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026

Small airways dysfunction: associated factors, clinical aspects and new perspectives.

Brice Touilloux, Antonio Cartellà, Christophe von Garnier, Claire Descombes, Kevin Nguyen, Adam Ogna, Laurève Chollet, Julien Vaucher, Alessio Casutt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brice TouillouxDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine and Specialties, Fribourg Hospital and University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland brice.touilloux@h-fr.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0924-6775
Antonio CartellàDivision of Pulmonology, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7201-141X
Christophe von GarnierDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), and Lausanne University (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3585-9176
Claire DescombesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8473-9106
Kevin NguyenFaculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3684-6552
Adam OgnaDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), and Lausanne University (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-2511
Laurève CholletCardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB) and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8769-5471
Julien VaucherDivision of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3230-3693
Alessio CasuttDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), and Lausanne University (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3824-9613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific interest in small airways emerged in the 1960s. However, despite this early recognition, they long remained a "silent" area of the lung. In this nonsystematic narrative mini-review, we evaluated the different spirometry thresholds used to define small airways dysfunction (SAD), comparing them with other diagnostic techniques. We then examined the various factors associated with SAD, focusing on SAD as defined by spirometry.Maximal mid-expiratory flow, especially below the lower limit of normal (LLN), appears to be the most accurate and reproducible spirometric measure to assess SAD. However, no gold-standard spirometric definition has been endorsed by respiratory academic societies, and forced expiratory volume in 3 s or 6 s <LLN or combined forced expiratory flow could be alternative criteria. Impulse oscillometry or computed tomography scanning represent possible alternative assessment methods, with limitations regarding reproducibility.Globally, prevalence of SAD varies between regions. Air pollution appears to be associated with a higher prevalence of SAD, particularly particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5 µm. Both active and passive smoking are associated with SAD. SAD is also strongly associated with COPD and the risk of developing it, making SAD a marker of accelerated decline in lung function. Several occupational exposures are associated with SAD, including exposure to organic and inorganic dust. A history of lung infections, especially tuberculosis, is also associated with SAD. Advanced age may also be an associated factor, although the association depends on the criteria used to define SAD. Cardiac events have been associated to SAD, which might explain the association between SAD and higher mortality risk.By integrating these different associations in clinical assessment, it would be possible to screen more reliably and preventively for SAD. This would ensure closer surveillance, which is justified given the strong association with COPD.

Indexed as

LungLung DiseasesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSpirometryForced Expiratory VolumeHumansOccupational ExposurePredictive Value of TestsPrevalencePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID42778201
PMCPMC13598626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.