Trial reportPediatrics2026
Pediatric Literacy Promotion for Latino Families by Texts and Referrals: A 3-Arm RCT.
Trial report in Pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo test 2 strategies designed to enhance primary care-based literacy promotion (LP): (1) text message reminders (texts), and (2) texts plus referral to community resources.
methodsWe recruited 630 Latino caregiver-infant (aged 6 to 12 months) dyads for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 randomized trial. Dyads were randomly assigned into (1) LP-only (Reach Out and Read), (2) LP plus text messages (LP+texts), or (3) LP+texts plus referral to Connecting New Jersey (CNJ) (LP+texts+CNJ), which streamlines access to community resources based on the national Help Me Grow model. Participants completed online surveys and assessments at enrollment, and 9 and 18 months after enrollment. Primary outcomes focused on 3 domains: child language and social-emotional development, and parenting behaviors, including reading and verbal responsiveness. We followed the intent-to-treat principle and used step-down minimum P value method to adjust for multiple comparisons.
resultsAmong caregivers, 74% had less than or equal to a high school diploma and 88% reported speaking English less than very well. At 18 months after enrollment, the LP+text arm [effect size (ES) = 0.391; adjusted (adj.) P = .001] but not LP+text+CNJ had higher language scores compared with LP-only. At 9 and 18 months after enrollment, the LP plus texts plus CNJ arm had higher scores on social-emotional development than LP-only (ES = 0.267; adj. P = .04 and ES = 0.300; adj. P = .03, respectively), whereas the LP+text arm did not. At 9 months after enrollment, scores were higher for the LP+text+CNJ arm on verbal responsiveness (ES = 0.400; adj. P < .001) and the LP+text arm on reading (ES = 0.415; adj. P = .002) compared with LP-only.
conclusionTwo strategies with high potential for scale enhanced LP's ability to promote relational and developmental health. Clinicians and policymakers can use this knowledge to optimize LP's impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.