ArticleBiophysical reports2026
Quantifying the spatio-temporal image degradation under motion blur in fluorescence microscopy.
Article in Biophysical reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spatial resolution of optical imaging systems is fundamentally restricted by the diffraction limit. However, in widefield live-cell microscopy, the achievable resolution is further constrained by specimen motion, which indicates the existence of a fundamental spatio-temporal resolution trade-off between signal accumulation during full frame integration and the resulting motion blur. To improve the fidelity with which moving objects can be imaged, a quantitative understanding of this spatio-temporal trade-off is necessary. Here, we present a systematic analysis of motion-induced resolution dynamics measured with the spectral signal-to-noise ratio (SSNR). We developed a simulation framework that models the image formation of objects undergoing arbitrary motion to evaluate the degradation of the spatial resolution under translational, diffusive, and rotational dynamics. Our results demonstrate that for translating objects, the spatial resolution is anisotropically reduced as a function of the orientation of the object relative to the motion vector, leading to the SSNR degrading by up to 50% and the resolution by up to 40% for a 90° change in the motion direction. This motion-blur-induced spectral degradation was further observed on simulated points under Brownian motion and dynamic Drosophila data. Moreover, we show that for rotational motion, conventional radially averaged metrics such as the Fourier ring correlation cannot quantify the effects of angular blur, which the SSNR quantifies accurately. These findings underscore the necessity of an object-oriented imaging approach, in which acquisition parameters such as exposure time are tuned to specific biological spatio-temporal characteristics to optimize the trade-off between motion blur and spatial fidelity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.